Task source :

https://github.com/Tzion0/CTF/tree/master/K3RN3LCTF/2021/K3RN3L%20DROID

Our goal is to retrieve the valid pin number to combine with another half of the flag: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_%s}

The only way to view validPinMessage is through valid_pin. We can see label5 is comparing the pinCode and jump to valid_pin if matched. The table below have references for intructions we need.

Mnemonic        Condition tested  Description
jo              OF = 1            overflow
jno             OF = 0            not overflow
jc, jb, jnae    CF = 1            carry / below / not above nor equal
jnc, jae, jnb   CF = 0            not carry / above or equal / not below
je, jz          ZF = 1            equal / zero
jne, jnz        ZF = 0            not equal / not zero
jbe, jna        CF or ZF = 1      below or equal / not above
ja, jnbe        CF or ZF = 0      above / not below or equal
js              SF = 1            sign
jns             SF = 0            not sign
jp, jpe         PF = 1            parity / parity even
jnp, jpo        PF = 0            not parity / parity odd
jl, jnge        SF xor OF = 1     less / not greater nor equal
jge, jnl        SF xor OF = 0     greater or equal / not less
jle, jng    (SF xor OF) or ZF = 1 less or equal / not greater
jg, jnle    (SF xor OF) or ZF = 0 greater / not less nor equal

Apparently the length of pinCode was 8:

call strlen
cmp rax, 0x8
jne invalid_pin_length

pinCode 1:

mov r9b, [pinCode + 0x0]
cmp r9b, 0x30
jne invalid_pin

We can see it is comparing with 0x30 and jump to invalid_pin if not equal. So the first pinCode was 0x30 which is equivalent to 0 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_0}

pinCode 2:

mov r9b, [pinCode + 0x1]
cmp r9b, 0x34
jne invalid_pin

Same as first one, so the second pinCode was 0x34 which is equivalent to 4 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_04}

pinCode 3:

mov r9b, [pinCode + 0x2]
cmp r9b, 0x37
jg invalid_pin
cmp r9b, 0x30
jne invalid_pin

We can see it is comparing with 0x37 and jump to invalid_pin if it was greater than 0x37, in other words, the correct pinCode was < 0x37. Now for the second comparison, the instruction was jump if not equal, which means the correct pinCode was 0x30, equivalent to 0 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_040}

pinCode 4:

mov r9b, [pinCode + 0x3]
cmp r9b, 0x39
je invalid_pin
cmp r9b, 0x30
jne invalid_pin

The first comparison compare if the pinCode is equal to 0x39, jump to invalid_pin, which is useless for us. For second comparison, again, jump to invalid_pin if not equal, so the correct pinCode was 0x30, equivalent to 0 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_0400}

pinCode 5:

mov r8b, [pinCode + 0x4]
cmp r8b, 0x31
jb invalid_pin
cmp r8b, 0x32
jge invalid_pin

The first comparison compare if the pinCode was below than 0x31, jump to invalid_pin. So the pinCode must be >= 0x31. For second comparison, if the pinCode was greater or equal to 0x32, jump to invalid_pin. Which means the correct pinCode is 0x32 > x >= 0x31. Thereforce the 0x31 was the correct pinCode, equivalent to 1 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_04001}

pinCode 6:

mov r8b, [pinCode + 0x5]
cmp r8b, 0x30
jbe invalid_pin
cmp r8b, 0x32
jae invalid_pin

First comparison check if pinCode was below or equal to 0x30, which means the pinCode must be > 0x30. The second comparison check if the pinCode is above or equal to 0x32, hence the correct pinCode is 0x31, equivalent to 1 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_040011}

pinCode 7:

mov r8b, [pinCode + 0x6]
cmp r8b, 0x39
jne invalid_pin

Again, jump if not equal. So the correct pinCode was 0x39, equivalent to 9 in ASCII.

Flag in progress: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_0400119}

pinCode 8:

mov r8b, [pinCode + 0x7]
cmp r8b, 0x36
jl invalid_pin
cmp r8b, 0x36
jg invalid_pin

The first comparison check if the pinCode was less than 0x36, means the correct pinCode is >= 0x36. For second comparison, it check if the pinCode is greater than 0x36, hence the correct pinCode was 0x36, equivalent to 6 in ASCII.

Final Flag: flag{K3RN3L_DR0ID_04001196}